The Similarities Between Marx and Aurelius Essay

The Similarities Between Marx and Aurelius - Essay precedentIt will be shown how they agreed and the differences they shared. Karl Marxs Estranged Labour confirms that military personnel is defined by the work he produces. His whole identity is intertwined with the right to work. Man is a product of his environment. He identifies himself with the fruit of the efforts. Aureliuss environment is the Universe, record and Divine Providence. He considers it more than important the work ace does upon his intelligence and his existence in the present. To apologise Marxs economic principle, if the man is a product of his substantial wealth in which his work is for someone else, the more he works, the poorer he becomes. The alienation of labor occurs because labor is not essential to his being. He does not wander himself but denies himself, does not feel content but unhappy, does not develop freely his physical and psychological energy but mortifies his body and ruins his mind (74) If he is poor, he becomes alienated to what he is doing and his self-identity is destroyed. If he has a low concept of himself. He will become estranged to former(a)s and his society. Marx says as we work for others, we become slaves to the sensible wealth we produce. Material wealth will determine our level of happiness. How can one think exceedingly of himself if he is poor and hates what he is doing? An earlier philosopher, John Locke said that work was one of the unalienable rights of man. Aurelius said that work should set out a purpose. Aurelius defines the man by his introspection and lack of material wealth. Aurelius shows man what needs to be done in order to be happy. Marxs implicitly says that our happiness is defined by the projection of our self-identity. Aurelius says we only can find freedom when we no longer depend on material wealth. Karl Marx work is essential so that an individual does not become estranged or alienated from himself and other workers. Self-concept ion is defined by the fruits of ones efforts. Work or labor on physical matter enables an individual to take over his basic needs and see himself in terms of society. If we agree that self-conception is defined by the effort one puts into the work, both Marx and Aurelius agree to the meaning of happiness. Aurelius would say that Necessity is the need to work. The ability to create from the soul forms ones in the flesh(predicate) identity and thus enables personal survival and the desire to survive. These three concepts are the basis of humanity. Aurelius would agree at his level, as change keeps the universe going. The transformation of nature into objects is one of the fundamental aspects of human condition. Two disparate philosophers agree that the universe has to have constant creation and change otherwise there is decay and death. Aurelius apply different language to say that we are all from one universe and must work unneurotic to find a common ground. It is not natural to stand in each others way. He would have agreed with Marx that it would not have been natural to have an unhappy worker. Aurelius didnt want the man to become disconcert by the material aspects of life. He did not really explain if the necessities of life were part of the material aspects. angiotensin converting enzyme would have to assume that he meant material wealth. The basic daily needs of man were met. Once over again Aurelius and Marx mentioned that people should not have to suffer from others, whether they were good or bad if they did not work harmoniously together.